Teaching Philosophy

Engaged Learning

My teaching is built around the students who are actually in the room — their lives, their identities, and the structural realities they navigate every day.

Student Populations

First-generation college students
Non-traditional learners
Students with caregiving roles
Multilingual learners
Latinx & BIPOC students
My teaching is rooted in a simple conviction: higher education should expand opportunity, not reproduce existing hierarchies.

I design courses for the students who are actually in the room — first-generation learners, students navigating caregiving and multiple jobs, students whose scholarship has been historically sidelined. At UCSB and Santa Barbara City College, I build flexible, rigorous courses that connect course concepts to lived experience, prioritize non-Western and non-white scholars, and integrate ethical, equity-centered approaches to emerging technologies.

My path to the classroom began outside academia. Nearly a decade in consulting — including leadership development with at-risk youth in Charlotte public schools and professional development with first-generation students at UNC Charlotte — taught me that student success depends not only on skills but on belonging, confidence, and relief from systemic barriers. I brought those lessons into the classroom and have never let them go.

Whether I'm teaching public speaking to students juggling two jobs or a graduate seminar on AI and power, the goal is the same: students leave feeling both challenged and seen. I am intentional about whose scholarship students encounter, centering non-Western and non-white voices to challenge epistemic hierarchies and validate students' own identities and experiences.

On AI in the Classroom My AI pedagogy emphasizes ethical, social, and disciplinary implications — not just technical fluency. Every course I teach integrates lessons on algorithmic bias, authorship, sustainability, and power dynamics. Students don't just learn to use AI; they learn to interrogate it.

Courses Taught

Curriculum

Format Course Title Institution Level Focus Area
In-Person Introduction to Communication UCSB / SBCC Undergraduate Foundations
In-Person Public Speaking SBCC Undergraduate Oral Communication
Online Collaborative Technologies & the Dynamics of Organizing UCSB Undergraduate Technology & Organizational Communication
Online Deception Communication UCSB Undergraduate Deception, Detecting Deception, Deception with Technologies

Classroom Practice

Sample Activities & Exercises

Each activity below is designed around a specific learning outcome and includes a structured debrief. All have been adapted for diverse student populations including first-generation, multilingual, and non-traditional learners.

Teambuilding & Experiential

The Broken Telephone Tower

Small groups build the tallest freestanding structure they can with limited materials — but each member can only communicate with the person directly next to them. The constraint surfaces how communication breakdowns compound under pressure, and what real coordination actually requires versus assumed coordination.

Debrief Focus Where did assumptions substitute for communication? Who led, and why? What would change if you could start over?

Used in: Public Speaking • Introduction to Communication

Discussion & Socratic

Who's in the Room When the Robot Speaks?

Students receive a transcript of a real chatbot customer-service interaction and map every hidden stakeholder — the company, the user, the designers, regulators, and the communities affected by the system's decisions. Designed to make power visible in what looks like a neutral exchange.

Central Prompt If this chatbot has a personality, who decided that — and why? Whose interests does that personality serve?

Used in: Human-Machine Communication • Introduction to Communication

Research & Writing

Technology Autobiography

Students write a reflective essay tracing a single technology they use daily: when they adopted it, how it changed their behavior, and who benefits from that change. The assignment scaffolds academic argument-building from lived experience — particularly effective with first-generation and SBCC students who may not yet see their own lives as worthy of academic inquiry.

Learning Outcome Students practice moving from personal observation to structural analysis — the foundation of communication scholarship.

Used in: Introduction to Communication • Public Speaking

Role-Play & Simulation

The Deployment Decision

Teams are assigned roles — CEO, frontline worker, ethicist, regulator, affected community member — and must negotiate whether to deploy an AI hiring tool. Each role receives different private information. The simulation surfaces how power shapes whose concerns get heard, whose expertise is discounted, and who bears the costs of a bad decision.

Debrief Focus Whose voice was easiest to dismiss? What information stayed private, and why? How does positional power shape what counts as a valid concern?

Used in: Power, Agency & AI Systems • Human-Machine Communication

Faculty Initiatives

Beyond the Classroom

AI Ethics Toolkit — SBCC Faculty Cohort

Leading a faculty cohort at Santa Barbara City College to develop a discipline-specific AI Ethics Toolkit that supports equitable, critical approaches to AI integration across departments. The toolkit addresses algorithmic bias, authorship, sustainability, and the power dynamics embedded in AI systems.

Cohort Lead • In Progress

UCSB AI Community of Practice

Active member of UCSB's Office of Teaching and Learning AI Community of Practice, collaborating with faculty across disciplines to develop pedagogically sound, equity-conscious approaches to AI in higher education. Contributes research expertise on human-machine communication and power dynamics.

Active Member

High School AI & Communication Program

Designed and piloted a summer program for high school seniors at UCSB exploring AI through a communication lens — not a coding lens. Students examine how AI shapes public discourse, interpersonal interaction, and institutional power, with hands-on lab activities that require no prior technical background.

Program Designer

Mentorship & Research Assistantships

Mentorship is central to my work. I prioritize hiring Latinx, Chicanx, and African American students as research assistants, and actively support students navigating institutional barriers — always centering their agency. I also manage mentoring initiatives for ICA's Human-Machine Communication Interest Group, supporting early-career scholars.

Ongoing

Interested in Collaborating?

Available for guest lectures, faculty workshops, curriculum consultation, and collaborative research on pedagogy and AI ethics.