Teaching Philosophy

Engaged Learning

My teaching is built around the students who are actually in the room, whoever they are — with the flexibility to meet learners wherever they're starting from.

Course Design Priorities

Flexible pacing & formats
Real-world, applied learning
Multiple paths to demonstrate mastery
Low-stakes on-ramps to participation
My teaching is rooted in a simple conviction: good course design should work for whoever walks through the door, not just the student it was built to assume.

I design courses for the students who are actually in the room. At UCSB and Santa Barbara City College, that's mostly traditional college students — but courses still need room to flex, whether for a returning adult learner, a first-generation student, or someone juggling more than they let on. I build flexible, rigorous courses that connect course concepts to lived experience and integrate ethical, equity-centered approaches to emerging technologies.

My path to the classroom began outside academia. Nearly a decade in consulting — including leadership development with at-risk youth in Charlotte public schools and professional development with first-generation students at UNC Charlotte — taught me that student success depends not only on skills but on belonging, confidence, and relief from systemic barriers. I brought those lessons into the classroom and have never let them go.

Whether I'm teaching an intro lecture hall or a graduate seminar on AI and power, the goal is the same: students leave feeling both challenged and supported. I'm intentional about whose scholarship students encounter in my courses, drawing on a range of scholarly perspectives rather than a narrow canon.

On AI in the Classroom My AI pedagogy emphasizes ethical, social, and disciplinary implications — not just technical fluency. Every course I teach integrates lessons on algorithmic bias, authorship, sustainability, and power dynamics. Students don't just learn to use AI; they learn to interrogate it.

Courses Taught

Curriculum

Format Course Title Institution Level Focus Area
In-Person Introduction to Communication UCSB / SBCC Undergraduate Foundations
In-Person Public Speaking SBCC Undergraduate Oral Communication
Online Collaborative Technologies & the Dynamics of Organizing UCSB Undergraduate Technology & Organizational Communication
Online Deception Communication UCSB Undergraduate Deception, Detecting Deception, Deception with Technologies

Classroom Practice

Sample Activities & Exercises

Each activity below is designed around a specific learning outcome and includes a structured debrief, with the flexibility to meet learners at different starting points.

Teambuilding & Experiential

The Broken Telephone Tower

Small groups build the tallest freestanding structure they can with limited materials — but each member can only communicate with the person directly next to them. The constraint surfaces how communication breakdowns compound under pressure, and what real coordination actually requires versus assumed coordination.

Debrief Focus Where did assumptions substitute for communication? Who led, and why? What would change if you could start over?

Used in: Public Speaking • Introduction to Communication

Discussion & Socratic

Who's in the Room When the Robot Speaks?

Students receive a transcript of a real chatbot customer-service interaction and map every hidden stakeholder — the company, the user, the designers, regulators, and the communities affected by the system's decisions. Designed to make power visible in what looks like a neutral exchange.

Central Prompt If this chatbot has a personality, who decided that — and why? Whose interests does that personality serve?

Used in: Human-Machine Communication • Introduction to Communication

Research & Writing

Technology Autobiography

Students write a reflective essay tracing a single technology they use daily: when they adopted it, how it changed their behavior, and who benefits from that change. The assignment scaffolds academic argument-building from lived experience, helping students who don't yet see their own lives as worthy of academic inquiry build that confidence.

Learning Outcome Students practice moving from personal observation to structural analysis — the foundation of communication scholarship.

Used in: Introduction to Communication • Public Speaking

Role-Play & Simulation

The Deployment Decision

Teams are assigned roles — CEO, frontline worker, ethicist, regulator, affected community member — and must negotiate whether to deploy an AI hiring tool. Each role receives different private information. The simulation surfaces how power shapes whose concerns get heard, whose expertise is discounted, and who bears the costs of a bad decision.

Debrief Focus Whose voice was easiest to dismiss? What information stayed private, and why? How does positional power shape what counts as a valid concern?

Used in: Power, Agency & AI Systems • Human-Machine Communication

Faculty Initiatives

Beyond the Classroom

AI Ethics Toolkit — SBCC Faculty Cohort

Leading a faculty cohort at Santa Barbara City College to develop a discipline-specific AI Ethics Toolkit that supports equitable, critical approaches to AI integration across departments. The toolkit addresses algorithmic bias, authorship, sustainability, and the power dynamics embedded in AI systems.

Cohort Lead • In Progress

UCSB AI Community of Practice

Active member of UCSB's Office of Teaching and Learning AI Community of Practice, collaborating with faculty across disciplines to develop pedagogically sound, equity-conscious approaches to AI in higher education. Contributes research expertise on human-machine communication and power dynamics.

Active Member

High School AI & Communication Program

Designed and piloted a summer program for high school seniors at UCSB exploring AI through a communication lens — not a coding lens. Students examine how AI shapes public discourse, interpersonal interaction, and institutional power, with hands-on lab activities that require no prior technical background.

Program Designer

Mentorship & Research Assistantships

Mentorship is central to my work. I prioritize hiring Latinx, Chicanx, and African American students as research assistants, and actively support students navigating institutional barriers — always centering their agency. I also manage mentoring initiatives for ICA's Human-Machine Communication Interest Group, supporting early-career scholars.

Ongoing

Interested in Collaborating?

Available for guest lectures, faculty workshops, curriculum consultation, and collaborative research on pedagogy and AI ethics.