Consulting · Research · Advisory

Your AI strategy
is a human
problem.

Organizations that fail at AI adoption don't fail because the technology doesn't work. They fail because implementation ignores how people exercise judgment, navigate authority, and build trust. I study exactly that.

Start the conversation

Areas of Practice

What I Offer

AI Adoption

AI Organizational Readiness Assessment

Before you deploy, you need to know which roles will resist, which workflows will break, and where the real friction lives. I conduct the qualitative and organizational analysis that your IT team can't — and your vendor won't.

  • Stakeholder interviews and role-based power mapping
  • Communication audit of existing technology workflows
  • Risk identification across organizational levels
  • Adoption strategy with implementation roadmap
  • Executive summary + team-level briefings

AI Curriculum

AI Ethics Curriculum Design

Most AI ethics training is too abstract to change behavior and too generic to fit your organization's context. I design curriculum grounded in communication research — built around the actual decisions your people will face.

  • Needs assessment and learning objective mapping
  • Modular curriculum design (workshops, course sequences, or executive briefings)
  • Case studies drawn from relevant industry contexts
  • Facilitator guides and assessment instruments
  • Train-the-trainer sessions available
See the Flagship AI Workshop ↓

Flagship Workshop

Applied AI Literacy Workshop

Not tool training. Judgment training.

Most AI training teaches you which buttons to press. Six months later the tool has changed, the buttons are somewhere else, and you're back where you started — except now your staff are using something you never approved, on client work, and nobody can explain why an output is fine or not fine beyond a gut feeling.

The tools will keep changing. What doesn't change is how these systems actually work, where they reliably fail, and what that means for the decisions you have to make.

What You'll Be Able to Decide

  • Which of your work AI can touch — and which it can't, with a reason you can defend to a client or a partner
  • Whether the time savings are real — once verification is honestly counted, not assumed
  • Whether a vendor's AI claim holds up — or is marketing
  • What you tell clients about AI use — and when
  • What your staff are allowed to do — written down, in terms that survive the next tool release
  • When to say no — and why, not just that it feels wrong

What Makes It Different

  • Comparative evaluation as a method. Participants run the same task through competing tools and judge outputs against defined criteria. The skill transfers to tools that don't exist yet.
  • A documented record of what you rejected. Judgment becomes something practiced and written down, not asserted.
  • Interfaces get audited, not just discussed. Ethics becomes observable in a real product critique rather than staying abstract.
Format Modular sessions built around your focus and available time. Three-hour minimum. Flexible group size. No prerequisite. Can be delivered on site or remotely.

Tell me who's in the room and what's already going wrong, and I'll tell you what a session would look like.

Testimonials

What Clients Say

Add your testimonial here. This is placeholder text for a client quote about your work on AI adoption or curriculum design.

Client Name

Title, Organization

Add your testimonial here. This is placeholder text for a client or student quote about the impact of your work.

Client Name

Title, Organization

Add your testimonial here. This is placeholder text for a third quote, perhaps from a workshop participant or academic partner.

Client Name

Title, Organization

Ready to Work Together?

Whether you have a defined project in mind or just want to explore how this expertise applies to your context, I'm glad to talk.